A guide to Jev in production
Build the case for
AI decision automation.
Evaluate Jev for the decisions your operations depend on. Compare costs, examine workflow fit and define what to measure before you change production.
02 / Response time
0.114sJev
vs8.566sLLM
TypeSafe’s published workflow comparison. Results depend on the task.
View vendor comparison ↗03 / Decision controlCalibrated
confidence
confidence
Route uncertain decisions for review. Validate thresholds on your data.
Understand confidence routing →The business case
Evaluate one workflow
Start with an illustrative scenario. Replace its assumptions with your operating data.
From a request to an operational decision
A support request becomes a routing decision. Your application receives the selected team, probabilities and a confidence score.
Request
{
"state": "My running shoes arrived in the wrong
size. Can I swap them for a size 10?",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"department": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "Which team should handle this?",
"criteria": {
"returns": "Exchanges, wrong or damaged items",
"shipping": "Delivery status, delays, lost packages",
"billing": "Charges, invoices, payment problems"
}
}
}
}
Response
{
"model": "jev-1.13.0",
"answers": {
"department": {
"type": "choice",
"choice": "returns",
"confidence": 1.0,
"probabilities": {
"shipping": 0.0, "returns": 1.0, "billing": 0.0
}
}
},
"usage": { "input_tokens": 328, "output_tokens": 34 }
}
- choice is always one of your keys. No malformed output.
- confidence decides the route: act, confirm or escalate.
- model names the exact version. Pin it and log it.
From estimate to evidence
Validate the case
on your own workflow.
Run Jev alongside your current model. Measure accuracy, escalation rates, latency and cost before deciding what moves to production.